James M Snell wrote:
As the author of 4685 I'm a bit biased but I'm not sure I see the need
for the new rel attribute. in-reply-to would seem to cover the need well
enough.
So, just to complete the thought, the proposal is to use in-reply-to to
represent a bookmark? In other words, we'd be modelling a bookmark as a
response to an entry.
Presumably this would look something like this:
<entry>
<author>
<name>Mart</name>
</author>
<id>tag:ma.gnolia.com,2005:Ma.gnolia-slokowuyird</id>
<published>2009-01-11T22:02:04-08:00</published>
<updated>2009-01-11T22:02:04-08:00</updated>
<thr:in-reply-to
href="http://www.ietf.org/ietf/1id-guidelines.html";
type="text/html"
/>
<link
href="http://ma.gnolia.com/people/Mart/bookmarks/slokowuyird";
rel="alternate"
type="text/html"
/>
<title>
I-D Guidelines: Guidelines to Authors of Internet-Drafts
</title>
<content type="html">[elided]</content>
<category term="ietf" scheme="http://ma.gnolia.com/tags"/>
<category term="web standards" scheme="http://ma.gnolia.com/tags"/>
</entry>
How is a consumer intended to determine that the above is a "bookmark"
(i.e. annotated pointer) rather than a reply in the traditional sense?
