+1 LGTM
On May 16, 2010 11:29 PM, "James Snell" <[email protected]> wrote:
Ok, although I seriously dislike having to do additional parsing on
attribute values, the arguments made so far are valid and parsing hex
encoded hash digests is -- fortunately -- quite simple to do. So let's
go with the following syntax...
hash = attribute hash { hash-list }
hash-list = # ( token ":" 1*HEX )
The token and HEX productions are defined by RFC2616...
The spec would defer to the existing IANA registry for hash functions
to define the "tokens"
This would result in a syntax of...
hash="md5:abc...xyz, sha-1:123...567, sha-512:xyz...abc"
This seem acceptable to everyone?
- James
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Sam Johnston <[email protected]> wrote:
> James,
> In consideration o...
