Are the commas earning their keep? If they're unnecessary then remove them, otherwise LGTM.
Sam On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Bob Wyman <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 LGTM > > On May 16, 2010 11:29 PM, "James Snell" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ok, although I seriously dislike having to do additional parsing on > attribute values, the arguments made so far are valid and parsing hex > encoded hash digests is -- fortunately -- quite simple to do. So let's > go with the following syntax... > > hash = attribute hash { hash-list } > hash-list = # ( token ":" 1*HEX ) > > The token and HEX productions are defined by RFC2616... > > The spec would defer to the existing IANA registry for hash functions > to define the "tokens" > > This would result in a syntax of... > > hash="md5:abc...xyz, sha-1:123...567, sha-512:xyz...abc" > > This seem acceptable to everyone? > > - James > > > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Sam Johnston <[email protected]> wrote: > > James, > > In consideration o... > >
