yes, and of course since OWL can specify mappings between the rdf vocabulary
and the atom vocabulary it may even be possible to specify that atom:type is a
sub property of rdf:datatype so that we end up with:
atom:type="&atom;XHTML"
Any further simplification ideas would be welcomed. The aim is to make the
rdf as invisible as possible to anyone other than atom extension writers. If we
have to bring out difficult rdf tools, so be it.
Henry Story
On 17 Jan 2005, at 21:15, Danny Ayers wrote:
I think there may be a very clean mapping of the content by simply taking the typing as used in Atom, defining each through XML Schema, then using URIs for each as the value for rdf:datatype in literals. It sounds complicated but in effect it should mean something like e.g. type="XHTML" being replaced by rdf:datatype="http://purl.org/atom/datatypes#XHTML";, the rest of the RDF/XML syntax being near-identical to Atom.
