Tim Bray wrote:
I just read this, and it's moving toward being a usable Pace, but it isn't one yet. Could Henry or someone please update it so it has *specific* suggestions for language changes to the draft, then we can see if it gets consensus support.
I agree, but one point mentioned there is bothering me.
"Atom attributes are not in the atom namespace. It is deprecated in rdf for this to be the case. (so I suppose this means it is still possible)."
What course of action can we take with that?
Robert Sayre
