Sam Ruby wrote:
Done: http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceRemoveVersionAttr
Note: I added some questions at the bottom. Much to my surprise, scanning the current document, I don't see any "must ignore" text.
I really like the ideas about specifying how Atom should be both forward and backwards compatible and that if a new specification can not comply to that, a new namespace should be used.
-- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
