On 8/2/05 10:44 AM, "Robert Sayre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure they are that antagonistic, but I agree with Paul when he
> says they could be added later. If profiles aren't supposed to matter to
> "Core Atom" processors, why not put our money where our mouth is and
> make profiles declare themselves in their own namespace?
would it be acceptable to use a profile to weaken cardinality rules?
for example, a profile for a (S)SFF (remember them?) would allow entries as
minimal as this:
<entry>
<id>some-id</id>
<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="..." />
<updated>...</updated>
</entry>
how might this be represented in a namespaced extension instead?
e.
