(BAt 19:03 05/02/16, Bill de h$B%b(Bra wrote:
(B
(B >> As long as it's XML and otherwise conformant, I think it's fine.
(B >> >Probably not. Do you and Julian and Anne and Henri approve?
(B >> I don't see how I would want to complain about how you generate
(B >> your stuff, as long as the result is following the specs.
(B >
(B >The point I'm seeing here is that creating markup using string concats is (Binherently fragile. No surpise there. Wrt namespaces, fragility is (Beliminated when you stop using defaults (but there are other (Bconsiderations which keep string concat fragile). Use of div covers off the (BXHTML case.
(B
(BYes, use of div covers that case. But that doesn't mean that if
(Bsome people want to use div, everybody has to use div.
(B
(BRegards, Martin.

Reply via email to