On 16/5/05 8:12 AM, "David Powell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PaceAllowDuplicateIDs received some opposition because of its use of > atom:updated to differentiate multiple revisions of an entry [1][2][3]. > > I've posted a couple of Paces - basically a single a proposal, split > into two bite-size pieces: > > <http://intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceAllowDuplicateIdsWithModified> > <http://intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceDateModified2> +1 There was opposition to atom:modified because we couldn't see a need for it. Now we have a need for it. e.
