Le 05-05-24 � 14:31, Paul Hoffman a �crit :
I am completely unclear why this discussion is going on. Is there a
desire on the part of the W3C to take the Atom work into the W3C?
Are you insecure?
Where did you read, imagine such a thing?
The case has been settled for a long time by choice of the Atom
Community. No trouble.
If so, talking to the W3C/IETF liaison pair would be more
appropriate than this mailing list. If not, then suggesting that
our document should be more W3C-like seems fairly out-of-scope for
an IETF WG.
[I just removed initial thought here.]
Could you clarify?
Did you miss an email?
[[[I have done the review of Atom 0.8 to ___test___ W3C QA
Specification Guidelines with an external technical document and I
thought it could be also useful to the Atom community.
]]] - http://www.imc.org/atom-syntax/mail-archive/msg15675.html
and the rest, I'm replying to the questions. :)
--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
