On 18/10/05 6:14 PM, "Thomas Broyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, and navigating through the historical states of the feed resource is > not paging, it's more like having access to archives. > > I was thinking about proposing yet another link relation "archives": in > the general use case, it would reference another feed document where each > entry describes an archive: The word 'archives' is too general though. May I suggest @rel="history" instead? Otherwise, +1 e.
