On 10/18/05, Eric Scheid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 19/10/05 5:38 AM, "Robert Sayre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I already have code that uses "next" for this. Why do we want to change it? > > Why did you choose "next"?
Because that is what's already been deployed and what my software uses. Robert Sayre
