On 1/4/06 12:24 PM, "James Holderness" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you might get more > involvement if the tests were easier to use though. By that I mean tests > that say exactly how they should be interpreted and that you can see at a > glance whether you've got a pass or failure. Having to click through links > to see if they are valid can get a bit tiresome when you've trying to > evaluate 16 tests on 20 different aggregators. one way would be to use <img /> instead of <a /> links, with each test image being specific to the test ... that way all one needs to do is read the feed and check to see if the text in the image corresponds to the text in the entry headline. Especially easy if the tests were numbered. e.
