* James Holderness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-01 04:35]:
> I think you might get more involvement if the tests were easier
> to use though. By that I mean tests that say exactly how they
> should be interpreted and that you can see at a glance whether
> you've got a pass or failure. Having to click through links to
> see if they are valid can get a bit tiresome when you've trying
> to evaluate 16 tests on 20 different aggregators.

I agree that this would be good. The test suite seems quite
awkward so far. I just can’t think of any ways to automate tests
to the extent you propose. Have you got any suggestions for a
format to use?

Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>

Reply via email to