Excellent, thank you. John Panzer wrote: > Experience report: Our implementation of comments for AOL blogs > includes the count information in a proprietary extension > (aj:commentCount), precisely because we need the information for UI > purposes. We've found it useful and we'd like to use a more standard > extension to help enable interoperability. > The one issue we've had with it was with a partner who used a checksum > on the retrieved file to determine if something has 'changed' in the > feed. We explained how they can use the update timestamps for that > purpose and everything was solved. > > I don't see any issue with these attributes. > > -John >
- Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Proposed St... The IESG
- Re: Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' to Pr... Bill de hÓra
- Re: Last Call: 'Atom Threading Extensions' t... James M Snell
- Informational vs. standards-track (Was: Re: ... Paul Hoffman
- Re: Informational vs. standards-track (W... Bill de hÓra
- Re: Informational vs. standards-track (Was: ... Robert Sayre
- Re: Informational vs. standards-track (W... Julian Reschke
- Re: Informational vs. standards-track (W... A. Pagaltzis
- Re: Informational vs. standards-trac... James M Snell
- Re: Informational vs. standards... John Panzer
- Re: Informational vs. stand... James M Snell
- Re: Informational vs. stand... Robert Sayre
- Re: Informational vs. s... Sylvain Hellegouarch
- Re: Informational vs. s... Lisa Dusseault
- Re: Informational vs. s... Robert Sayre
- Re: Informational vs. s... Lisa Dusseault
- Re: Informational vs. s... Robert Sayre
- Re: Informational vs. standards-track (W... Paul Hoffman
- Re: Informational vs. standards-track (W... Robert Sayre
- Re: Informational vs. standards-trac... Paul Hoffman
- Re: Informational vs. standards-trac... Robert Sayre
