On 5/18/06, Lisa Dusseault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 17, 2006, at 10:02 AM, Robert Sayre wrote: > > Well, you clearly don't think they're important. But then you felt > compelled to change them back and got an instant stamp of approval > from our AD. What happened there?
My question has yet to be answered.
I could still recommend Experimental instead of Standards Track if I learned of some possible harm to security/privacy or Internet health, or some deep barrier to interoperability, but I have not yet learned of a high enough risk+severity of such concerns to change my mind there.
I think this is an excellent standard. If another individual, such as myself, were to submit an individually authored document, it would have to meet the same standard, right?
I hope that makes the situation clearer!
Sure does! -- Robert Sayre
