At 10:43 06/07/10, Robert Sayre wrote: >Hi Lisa, > >Thanks for the clarification. You may have missed another question I >recently asked, so I'll repeat it here. I am concerned that purl.org >lists the document author as the owner of the namespace URI, and I >wonder how the IESG came to the conclusion that the namespace is not a >problem. I see Sam Hartman raised the issue. What was the resolution? >Could the draft advance to Draft- or Full-Standard in that namespace?
I looked at that namespace shortly. It seems that it would be easy to change the owners to make clear that this is owned by the IETF. This can be done whenever it's needed. A purl namespace in and by itself isn't any better or worse than a W3C namespace. Regards, Martin. #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
