On 7/18/06, Lisa Dusseault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We don't have rules against such namespace choices. We could argue about whether or not we should have such rules,
Well, there is a BCP about this.
At this point, it's very rare to pull a document or change something like this that would affect implementations. Often the remedy at this stage is...
I should hope that the IETF/IESG doesn't encounter this situation often, but that doesn't seem like a strong argument. How commonly are private namespaces used in IETF standards? The right argument to have is whether the namespace is a problem. Even the draft's author acknowledges that it is a valid concern, though he probably doesn't have the same solution in mind. -- Robert Sayre
