On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 01:31:29 +0100, John Panzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Or both. Millions of blog entry pages have both an entry and a set of
comments on that entry. Yes, it's stretching the concept of 'alternate'
a long, long way.
Yes, it's a long stretch. RFC 4685 specifies how to build that
relationship; rel="alternate" is not the appropriate solution.
In any case, the relation type 'feed' would be better suited for the
feed reference and 'alternate' would suit the Entry reference if the
Entry indeed was an alternate representation of the HTML document.
Agreed, in an ideal world.
Considering that the 'feed' relationship is being baked in WHATWG, I don't
think that ideal world is such a utopia.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=- http://virtuelvis.com/quark/
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
