--- Bob Wyman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) Define ;type=feed and ;type=entry as optional > parameters. (i.e. get them > defined, registered, and "ready to use.") > 2) Leave RFC4287 unchanged. i.e. do NOT re-define > "application/atom-xml" > 3) New specifications MAY require that ;type=entry > be used. (Note: Just > because ;type=entry is used DOES NOT imply that > ;type=feed must also be > used....)
+1 on this approach. RFC4287 is a powerful argument in Atom's favor. Chip away at that spec and we're going to start hearing from Mr. Safe again.
