>
>
>
>On 5/16/2010 3:16 PM, Jackie Meese wrote:
>> On May 15, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Kirk Bocek wrote:
>>> I upgraded to 0.23-234 on CentOS 5.4 x86_64 yesterday. Seems like nuvexport 
>>> is still broken for me. Running nuvexport-xvid I get:
>>> system call:
>>> mkdir -m 0755 /tmp/fifodir_2216/
>>>
>>> forking:
>>> /bin/nice -n19 /usr/bin/mythtranscode --showprogress -p '0' -c '4797' -s 
>>> '2010-05-11T10:44:00' -f "/tmp/fifodir_2216/" --honorcutlist 2>&1
>>>
>>> forking:
>>> /bin/nice -n19 ffmpeg -threads 4 -y -f s16le -ar 48000 -ac 2 -i 
>>> /tmp/fifodir_2216/audout -f rawvideo -pix_fmt yuv420p -s 1920x1088 -aspect 
>>> 1.77777777777778 -r 29.970 ->i /tmp/fifodir_2216/vidout -aspect 
>>> 1.77777777777778 -r 29.970 -deinterlace -croptop    22 -cropright 38 
>>> -cropbottom 22 -cropleft  38 -s 1280x720  -vcodec xvid -b '3000k' -minrate 
>>> '32' ->maxrate '6000k' -bt '32k' -bufsize 65535 -flags +mv4+loop+aic+cgop 
>>> -trellis 1 -mbd 1 -cmp 2 -subcmp 2 -b_qfactor '150' -b_qoffset '100' -bf 
>>> '1' -pass 2 -passlogfile '/tmp/xvid.2216.log' ->acodec mp3 -async 1  -ab 
>>> '128k' -f avi '/mnt/area1/something.avi' 2>&1
>> 
>> If you run these commands, I'm guessing you'll see what I did: that for some 
>> reason nuvexport doesn't acknowledge any protocols in atrpms' ffmpeg 
>> package. You can edit the >nuvexport scripts, or remove ffmpeg from atrpms, 
>> and install it from rpmfusion. Mixing repos has it's downsides, so beware. 
>> 
>> rpm -e --nodeps ffmpeg
>> rpm -ivh 
>> http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/releases/12/Everything/i386/os/ffmpeg-0.5-5.20091026svn.fc12.i686.rpm
>> 
>> If you run "yum update" or any other update tool (I run nearly all command 
>> line), you'll have to watch for an update from atrpms, since that is a newer 
>> version (0.5.1) than rpmfusion >packages. For now, I've added to 
>> /etc/yum.repos.d/atrpms.repo "exclude=ffmpeg*"
>
>Jackie,
>Unfortunately, attempting to install either the Fedora 12 i386 or x86_64
>versions of ffmpeg from rpmfusion gives some libc and rpmlib dependency
>errors. My past experience has been that attempting to resolve these errors
>can quickly screw my ATrpms installation.
>
>Does anybody here have nuvexport working?

>From: Kirk Bocek <[email protected]>
>To: Jackie Meese <[email protected]>; ATrpms user list <[email protected]>
>Sent: Mon, May 17, 2010 2:35:30 PM
>Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] Nuvexport Fails

Sincerily, no. It's been broken for so long that I just stopped caring which is 
a pity because I really liked it. I am still looking for a replacement as 
versatile and easy to use as nuvexport was. But every time I got nuvexport 
working, the next update would break it. 

The last time I had it almost working, it would do everything, except save 
everything at the end. After 99.99% it would die. If I did it in the debug 
version every thing would work out fine. 
I hope it is solved, because ffmpeg was quite a lot faster, in my experience 
that the other transcoders. 

JP



 ------------------------------
/\_/\ 
|O O| [email protected]
~~~~  Javier Perez
~~~~  While the night runs
~~~~  toward the day...
m m   Pepebuho watches 
      from his high perch.

This message transmitted with 100% recyclable bits. No electrons were harmed
during its transmission. 


_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users



      
_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

Reply via email to