On 5/19/2010 12:12 PM, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 03:00:40PM -0700, Kirk Bocek wrote: >> This is feeling like my experiences as CentOS 4 started to age. >> Stuff broke and there didn't seem to be any way to fix it. The >> developers seem to be working on the latest Ubuntu or Fedora or >> whatever. I guess CentOS 5 is getting a bit long in the tooth. > > Is the CentOS *4* mentioned above a typo? I don't think you can make > much with mythtv on RHEL4/CentOS4. There is still a nostalgia package > of 0.21 for EL4 but that's all that humanely possible.
No. I meant Four, IV, binary 0100. I originally started with MythTV years ago on CentOS 4. And it was a PITA! Every sound and video driver I needed seemed to only work on a kernel later than the one Red Hat was providing. For awhile, I had to compile my own kernels. That worked but I wasn't happy having to do it. Things have been much easier with CentOS 5 and quite workable with the packages you've been providing. Many thanks and touchings of my forehead to the floor. This frustration with nuvexport just somehow feels like the old days. There is some kind of interaction between the version and capability detection routines in nuvexport and the version of ffmpeg you provide. I've tried a few manual edits to the perl code but nothing seems to work. I'd be happy to post a bug report if I could figure out where the problem is. But at this point based on comments from other users I just have to throw up my hands. Thanks again for a great resource, Axel. Kirk Bocek _______________________________________________ atrpms-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
