On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 07:50:08AM -0700, Kirk Bocek wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/26/2010 3:24 AM, Axel Thimm wrote:
> >Since this is a manual task and asynchronous to the actual driver
> >availability and packaging it is sometimes forgotten like in the case
> >from 195.36.24 to 195.36.31. You can always still
> >
> >yum install nvidia-graphics195.36.31
> >
> >to get the driver in question (if not there is a bug that should be
> >reported), and ideally you can poke the list or me to update the
> >selector package. :)
> 
> So to be clear, the correct procedure is: Installing
> 
>   nvidia-graphics
> 
> will pull in the currently designated stable version, right?

Yes.

> While installing
> 
>   nvidia-graphics##.##.##
> 
> will install that specific version. What happens if you have both
> installed?

Nothing, that's how nvidia-graphics works, you will end up having both
the fake nvidia-graphics-<version> package and the real-content
nvidia-graphics<version> packages installed.

> What happens if you have more than one ##.## version installed.

You will use nvidia-graphics-switch to choose which package will be
really used.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

Attachment: pgpNe9Dt4nksH.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
atrpms-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

Reply via email to