Seems to be on of the big arguments for using Go. Of course ATS will (rightly) never match the simplicity criteria that they strive for.
Though I imagine for more "complicated" scripts typechecking/constraint solving may become the predominant portion of time spent among compiling and running code (at least in some cases). Though in this case, it probably is less likely to qualify as a script ;-). On Monday, October 22, 2018 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-4, gmhwxi wrote: > > > Yes. Please use v0.9.26. TCC v0.9.25 is buggy and should be > avoided. > > I like TCC a lot. It is a pity that it does not get maintained these days. > > With TCC, I often use ATS for scripting. Once adequate lib support is > put into place, I feel that ATS can work very well for the need of shell > scripting > and beyond. > > On Monday, October 22, 2018 at 3:34:29 AM UTC-4, Chris Double wrote: >> >> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 3:19 PM Hongwei Xi <...> wrote: >> > >> > A few years back, I looked into to the possibility of using CINT >> > build an REPL for ATS2. Now Cling seems to be under active development: >> >> Can TCC compile ATS code? https://bellard.org/tcc/ >> >> It can be used as a dynamic code generator as well which would suit a >> REPL: >> >> https://bellard.org/tcc/tcc-doc.html#Libtcc >> https://github.com/TinyCC/tinycc/blob/mob/libtcc.h >> https://github.com/TinyCC/tinycc/blob/mob/tests/libtcc_test.c >> >> -- >> http://bluishcoder.co.nz >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ats-lang-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ats-lang-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to ats-lang-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/ats-lang-users. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ats-lang-users/c3f323b2-1d6c-4e25-978b-6367b87f2a34%40googlegroups.com.
