* David Kastrup (2006-01-16) writes: > If we announce stuff, bumping the versions to 11.83 might be the most > consistent way.
In my opinion it would not be necessary to bump the version number just for new distribution packages. > OTOH, providing the stuff for 11.82 without big > announcements will give us some leeway to have people test it before > we make a big blunder. Yep. >> Huh? Is the next release round the corner? > > Isn't it always? Only if you expect the next big bug warranting a new release to be round the corner as well. > More specifically: I have just handed in abstracts > for the Chemnitzer Linuxtage (a seriously great conference I've been > visiting for years on end) and the Dante-Tagung in Berlin, both at the > beginning of March. Then we should try to get some features done before that. Currently there haven't been enough changes to warrant a new release. I am thinking about the style system changes and the functionality for accessing TeX-related documentation. By the way, yesterday I had the idea to use the information from the parser to find the LaTeX package a certain command belongs to and use that to open the corresponding documentation. Not as good as a real command database with included documentation, but helpful anyway. > I also had to update my father's RedHat box for > PDF creation and it was somewhat embarrassing that 11.55+0.9.1 was the > newest usable stuff available. 11.81 without preview-latex would have > been simply unacceptable. And I did not want to mess with /usr/local > for now. Maybe use checkinstall? -- Ralf _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
