On Mon, Jan 16 2006, David Kastrup wrote: > David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Hm. Reiner, could you just upload the fixed 11.82 XEmacs package to >> our download site? I don't think it would do much harm.
Okay, I will do. I'll also upload new (SuSE) RPMs (auctex-emacs-11.82-1.suse.noarch.rpm and auctex-11.82-2.suse.src.rpm) without the bogus preview directory. >> I'll try to see whether the current spec file builds with the 11.82 >> tarball under Fedora, but not today. It should also be possible to use the auctex-11.82-?.suse.src.rpm. > Hm. The RPM provides "auctex" instead of "emacs-auctex". Looks like > a bad idea Isn't this more or less a cosmetic issue? FWIW, SuSE uses "emacs-auctex" for their AUCTeX package. > (and I can't rule out that it has been my own). It seems it was you... ,----[ M-x vc-annotate RET ] | 1.24 (dak 20-Aug-04): Provides: auctex `---- and... ,---- | revision 1.25 | date: 2004-08-20 03:16:38 +0000; author: dak; state: Exp; lines: +4 -4 | (Provides): Provide auctex as well to satisfy | preview-latex. create package emacs nevertheless. `---- > The XEmacs situation makes it quite desirable that we provide XEmacs > RPMs as well. BTW, in http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.auctex.devel/ (<news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) you have posted some patch for auctex.spec containing ... %package emacs-tetex %package emacs-anytex %package xemacs-tetex %package xemacs-anytex %package preview-tetex I tried a little bit to figure out how it's supposed to work, but I failed. > It is probably the least painful way to split this into three > completely independent packages: > > emacs-auctex > xemacs-auctex > preview-styles Sounds reasonable. Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/ _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
