Hi Marcin,
Marcin Borkowski <[email protected]> writes:
> No it doesn't. I discovered this today. This is a perfectly valid
> formula, for which forward-sexp doesn't work: $(0,1\rangle$.
I worked around it by doing things like:
\DeclarePairedDelimiter{\intercc}{[}{]}
\DeclarePairedDelimiter{\interoo}{]}{[}
\DeclarePairedDelimiter{\interco}{[}{[}
\DeclarePairedDelimiter{\interoc}{]}{]}
and then using \interoo{0,1} in the text. Bonus : I can change to
another notation whenever I want, e.g. :
\DeclarePairedDelimiter{\intercc}{[}{]}
\DeclarePairedDelimiter{\interco}{[}{)}
\DeclarePairedDelimiter{\interoo}{(}{)}
\DeclarePairedDelimiter{\interoc}{(}{]}
(the former is classical notation for intervals in french, the latter is
classical notation pretty much everywhere else, I guess)
--
Nico.
_______________________________________________
auctex-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
