Hi David, 2015-11-04 11:13 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup <[email protected]>: > Mosè Giordano <[email protected]> writes: > >> Hi Uwe, >> >> 2015-11-04 10:27 GMT+01:00 Uwe Siart <[email protected]>: >>> On 4 Nov 2015 at 10:07, Mosè Giordano wrote: >>> >>>> any objection against releasing a new version of AUCTeX by the end of >>>> this week, for example on Friday? AUCTeX 11.88.9 has been released to >>>> ELPA two weeks ago and no one lamented havoc so far. >>> >>> No objection from me as a (frenetic) user :-) I saw lots of beneficial >>> enhancements in the changelog and I'll be very pleased about 11.89. >>> >>> PS: No problems here with 11.88.9 (except the default of >>> LaTeX-fill-break-at-separators, which has been changed, I think). >> >> Yes, now the default is nil. > > What was the rationale for that change? preview-latex looks rather bad > when line breaks are put into math rather than outside. And breaking > inline math across lines gratuitously does not help legibility either. > > So I'd be interested in the rationale: the whole > LaTeX-fill-break-at-separators machinery was created because there was a > need for it in order to have documents maintain well under filling. So > it seems weird to disable it by default, making it mostly accessible to > experts (namely avid manual readers and customizers) rather than people > who prefer to have things "just work" out of the box.
There was a thread in [AUCTeX] mailling list, "11.88.9 and fill-paragraph oddness". Bye, Mosè _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
