David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes: >> So the "if they do not fit into one line" condition obviously broke >> for some reason, and rather than even try figuring out what happened, >> the functionality just gets squashed? > > Let me guess. > > commit 1f116b8499a0bd6081a473fb53dbf49ba49514cb > Author: Tassilo Horn <[email protected]> > Date: Fri Oct 9 07:54:51 2015 +0200 > > Fill $...$ like \(...\) (bug#21645) > > * latex.el (LaTeX-fill-move-to-break-point): Fill $...$ like > \(...\) (bug#21645)
I think what has happened is that somehow the correct filling for \(...\) and \[...\] broke at some point in time but no one noticed, and I myself thought that this strange filling where there's a line break after every inline math construct was intensional. Therefore I made $...$ be filled consistently with \(...\) in the above commit. Because it seems many people seem to still use $...$ instead of \(...\) now this "comb-style" filling attracted attention and users complained which resulted in the change of defaults. Now I see that $...$ was probably filled correctly and \(...\) (and likely alse \[...\]) was filled wrongly, so my commit fixed on the wrong end. So feel free to revert that commit and the change of the default value. Unfortunately, I can't estimate when I have time to look into this and fix the right end of the breakage. This is my first week on a new job [1], and on the weekend I have to do some work on our house which must be finished before the wet and cold season starts. Bye, Tassilo [1] ... and sadly I can't work on auctex during pauses there ... _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
