David Kastrup <[email protected]> writes: > Mosè Giordano <[email protected]> writes: > >> 2015-11-04 11:13 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup <[email protected]>: >>> Mosè Giordano <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>>> 2015-11-04 10:27 GMT+01:00 Uwe Siart <[email protected]>: >>>>> On 4 Nov 2015 at 10:07, Mosè Giordano wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> any objection against releasing a new version of AUCTeX by the end of >>>>>> this week, for example on Friday? AUCTeX 11.88.9 has been released to >>>>>> ELPA two weeks ago and no one lamented havoc so far. >>>>> >>>>> No objection from me as a (frenetic) user :-) I saw lots of beneficial >>>>> enhancements in the changelog and I'll be very pleased about 11.89. >>>>> >>>>> PS: No problems here with 11.88.9 (except the default of >>>>> LaTeX-fill-break-at-separators, which has been changed, I think). >>>> >>>> Yes, now the default is nil. >>> >>> What was the rationale for that change? preview-latex looks rather bad >>> when line breaks are put into math rather than outside. And breaking >>> inline math across lines gratuitously does not help legibility either. >>> >>> So I'd be interested in the rationale: the whole >>> LaTeX-fill-break-at-separators machinery was created because there was a >>> need for it in order to have documents maintain well under filling. So >>> it seems weird to disable it by default, making it mostly accessible to >>> experts (namely avid manual readers and customizers) rather than people >>> who prefer to have things "just work" out of the box. >> >> There was a thread in [AUCTeX] mailling list, "11.88.9 and >> fill-paragraph oddness". > > Seriously? There is a bug report for new Emacs versions' fill > functionality, and the reaction is to just disable the functionality > rather than address the problem? Without any discussion? > > LaTeX-fill-break-at-separators is a variable defined in ‘latex.el’. > Its value is ({ } \\\( \\\) \\\[ \\\]) > Original value was nil > > Documentation: > List of separators before or after which respectively a line > break will be inserted if they do not fit into one line. > > You can customize this variable. > > [back] > > So the "if they do not fit into one line" condition obviously broke for > some reason, and rather than even try figuring out what happened, the > functionality just gets squashed?
Let me guess. commit 1f116b8499a0bd6081a473fb53dbf49ba49514cb Author: Tassilo Horn <[email protected]> Date: Fri Oct 9 07:54:51 2015 +0200 Fill $...$ like \(...\) (bug#21645) * latex.el (LaTeX-fill-move-to-break-point): Fill $...$ like \(...\) (bug#21645) -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ auctex mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex
