mauidan wrote:
PhilNYC Wrote:
Because the jitter performance of the Transporter's digital outs is
measured to be much better than that of the SqueezeBox, and he's
clearly looking for better performance. Or even further, if the TacT
has a word clock out, he'd get even better performance using the
Transporter's word-clock input...
$2K is a lot of money to pay to get better jitter performance.
Especially since the jitter problem is just fiction to make
people spend money.
I can believe it was a real problem decades ago. I see nothing
to indicate that any recent audiophile equipment has any audible
differences any more.
IMHO, YMMV, etc.
--
Pat
http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimserver/slimsoftware.html
_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
