seanadams Wrote: > It's been covered before, but basically we already get the data sheet > specs of the KE grade by using the K, so it's unlikely to make a > cost-effective improvement. It is quite likely that they are the same > part - it's common practice to mark different grades or speeds of a > chip simply depending on demand, not actual yield. I never got around > to testing it though.
Thanks for the clarification! I must somehow have missed the earlier discussion of this when I searched for it. Your argument makes sense, obviously. I hadn't thought of it that way. One could argue, though, that at 10 cents, ANY improvement would be cost-effective. Actual measurements of K vs KE would have been interesting, but I suppose that is too much to ask of the modders. ;-) -- blackbear ------------------------------------------------------------------------ blackbear's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7015 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=26337 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
