Phil Leigh;134079 Wrote: > Not wishing to disagree violently and noting your subjective > point...I've yet to hear any physical room treatments applied to a > domestic setting that comes close to the TACT solution in terms of > end-result...and believe me I've spent 25 years trying! > I'm not saying it is perfect (what is?) - but if possible it should at > least be tried/heard.
You also don't need to use the TACT amps. In my 5.1 setup I have my TACT TCS MKII feeding a digital signal to my TACt BOZ 216/2200 amps and in my 2.2. setup, I use the analog outs of the RCS2.2.XP into Bel Canto amps. I, like you have tried many things and having lived with TACT gear for the past 2 years, could never do w/o them again. In my 5.1 setup, I can't even imagine the headaches of trying to achieve what I do with the TC MKII with any other setup. Every single audiophile that I have had listen to my TACT setups, has walked away stunned by the audible difference. I think it is something one needs to experience to fully appreciate. -- Sleestack *headphone:* singlepower sds-xlr at, classe sacd2, hd650 *2 channel:* tact rcs 2.2.xp w/ full aberdeen mods, bel canto oneref. 1000 monoblocks x 4,teac esoteric p-03/d-03, epiphany 12-12s (waiting for my 20-21s), tact w210 corner load subs *5.1 channel:* tact tcs mkii w/ aberdeen power supply, tact boz 216/2200 (x5) w/ aberdeen power supply, tact adc6 w/ full aberdeen mods, denon 5910, bel canto pl-1a, eggleston andra ii (x5), velodyne dd-15, pioneer elite pro 1130hd ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Sleestack's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6598 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=26306 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
