Hi,

Yes, your logic is somewhat flawed.  What won't change dramatically is
precisely the digital side.  Transports, including the SB3, will
virtually all sound the same through the right kind of DAC (ie,
something like the Lavry DA10 or another device that buffers and
re-clocks the signal).  So, you wouldn't need junk the SB3.  It is an
excellent transport with very low jitter at the s/pdif output.  What
you might want to change is what comes after the digital transmission.

DACs do differ considerably and some handle jitter better than others. 
Some have better output stages, volume controls, etc., than others.  The
Lavry DA10 is an exceptional DAC.  It is designed with the needs of
mastering studios, not audiophiles, in mind...and, frankly, that is a
higher standard.  It, and the Benchmark, is a better value than a
Musical Fidelity or other DACs costing much more (see Ben Diss's
comments).  So, with a SB3 and a Lavry ($975) you're in for $1,300. 
That is, in fact, cheaper than a Transporter.  I know, because I have a
SB3 and a Lavry.  Thing is, I also have a Transporter.

Here's what you get with the SB3+ RIGHT DAC setup: flexibility to
upgrade the DAC down the line, in case that is really necessary (it
really won't be); if one component goes south, you can swap  it out
while it it gets fixed. 

Now, with a Transporter purchase, you get the Transporter AND a second
SB3.  Now, your SB3 + Lavry/Benchmark is costing $1,600.  Almost the
SAME cost as the transporter.  So, for $100, what do you get?

1.  You get everything in one very attractive box.  I didn't think the
knob would be functional.  It is really functional and fun to use.  The
overall design is tasteful.  The side-by-side screens are very cool and
also very useful.  You don't have two devices on top of each other. 
You get a remote for the sound.  You get something that looks nice and
not industrial.

2.  You get fabulous value in terms of sound.  In the two weeks I've
had the Transporter, I've done the following test with friends:
Transporter, SB3, SB3+Lavry, Sony XA-9000, EC EMC1 CDP (c'mon, someone
get that).  Everyone agreed that that two CDP's sounded better than the
SB3 alone.  No surprise there.  However, everyone agreed that the SB3
and Lavry sounded better than the CDPs.  Again, no surprise.  Also, the
consensus was that the Transporter was superior, or at the very least
the equal off, the CDPs.  I wasn't shocked, given what we know about
the device.  Acid test: SB3 +  Lavry against the Transport.  It took me
a while to tease this one out.  Mind you, I am biased: I've been using
the Lavry since it came out and I know the sound.  After a while,
though, I found the Transporter to deliver a bit better imaging and 3-D
layering than the Lavry.  To check this out, I drove the Transporter
through the Lavry.  Same result.  In the end, I found, as did four
friends, that the Transport was simply more satisfying.  Perhaps by a
bit, perhaps as a matter of nuance, and perhaps subjectively, yes, but
more satisfying.  And, in one attractive box.

I'm keeping the SB3 and Lavry because I will use them in my second
system.   Having said that, I think the Transporter is an absolutely
terrific device.  If you get it with a SB3 thrown in...it's a great
deal.  Again, read Ben Diss's comments.

Good luck!




Coffee;150354 Wrote: 
> I'm a new member and I'm trying to decide whether to buy an SB3 and a
> DAC or a Transporter. Even with the free SB3 special, the Transporter
> still costs $1700. I can buy a PS Audio or Musical Fidelity DAC for
> about $1000. So the SB3+DAC combo is still $400 cheaper. The
> Transporter is no doubt a high quality piece of equipment, but so is
> Musical Fidelity stuff. In any case, the digital side is high-tech and
> will change rapidly, whereas the analog side hasn't and probably will
> not change significantly for a long time to come. With a separate DAC,
> I can junk the SB3 when something better comes up (like better wireless
> networking). Seems to make perfect sense to me.
> 
> I have searched this forum and cannot find this question raised
> previously. Is my logic flawed in some way?


-- 
highdudgeon

Relax.  It's about the music.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
highdudgeon's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2195
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29124

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to