adamslim;151234 Wrote: > I thought it was quite a good post, actually. The scientific method, > such that it can be applied to audio, would retain all curiosity for > unexpected factors and remain open. While I have respect for what you > have done, I feel that your 'now it is decided' attitude is a tad > unhelpful. > > Adam
Adam, I was refering to NB's attacks on my integrity which I feel are innaproprate and offensive. I agree that one test does not a denitive answer make. The only "definites" I would be willing to stand by are: There was no bias because we didn't know which PS we were listening to. It's unlikely that the differences were imagined since both of us scored so well. It's likely the differences reside in the PS's since there were no other obvious variables. I never claimed the differences couldn't be due to differences in each PS's ability to further clean the power, but that wasn't the point of the test. There was a difference, that's all. My friend is actually the one who wanted to do the test in order to decide if would upgrade his own PS. . The irony is that now that I have a TP my SB isn't even plugged in, I have no reason to convince myself that the elpac makes a difference. -- tomjtx ------------------------------------------------------------------------ tomjtx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7449 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29058 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
