ezkcdude;153380 Wrote: > When you can tell me what PSRR stands for, I'll get back into this > conversation (maybe). Until then, you can parse the words any way you > want. It doesn't change the bottom line, which is that using AD1896 is > one of the best methods for jitter attenuation (o.k.?) short of > synching clocks to the transport. This is just a fact, and there is no > need to belabor the point further. > > For those who want to learn more about how asynchronous sample rate > conversion (ASRC) is done, and why it is so good at rejecting jitter, > there's a great "tutorial" from a couple of years ago over at > diyaudio: > http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=28814&perpage=10&pagenumber=1
Power Supply Rejection Ratio? Anyway, what sort of an argument are you putting forward? I'm right so I'm right.. I've read very knowledgable people claim that ASRC embeds the jitter in the new upsampled stream. I've read a fair bit of information technology, and the reasoning behind this conlusion seemed perfectly reasonable to me. -- P Floding ------------------------------------------------------------------------ P Floding's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2932 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=29450 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
