Deaf Cat;159947 Wrote: 
> Hmmmm I know they are both lossless but I did listen to a few tracks in
> both wma and flac over and over and over, and it was only slight, but I
> thought the bass on the flac was a little tighter and the treble everso
> slightly clearer and more detailed.
> But hay, thats me - so I went with flac.
> 
> I know theoretically they should be the same.......There are both lossy and 
> lossless WMA algorithms. If you were comparing
lossy WMA to FLAC, it is quite possible you would have heard a
difference.  If you truly mean the less widely supported lossless WMA,
then ... well, as you say, that's you.


-- 
tom permutt
------------------------------------------------------------------------
tom permutt's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1893
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=30325

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to