Don't worry, I agree it is not an absolute test I've done in any way. I believe it is useful in trying to find out what the MS decoder does, but we really need to look at the code or talk to someone who knows what functionality is included to be certain.
Nikhil wrote: > Eric Carroll;185053 Wrote: >> But from my perspective, Olav's work seems pretty conclusive. He >> compared a 16b rip, a HDCD 24b capture and a digitized HDCD analog >> decode. Can you help us understand what your concern is here? Have we >> missed something? > > I don't mean to belittle what Olav has done - it is much appreciated. > My concern, in simple scientific terminology, is that this experiment > does not have a proper control. As Phil rightly pointed out, in absence > of any compression technique, file size will simply be a function of > track lenghth, sampling rate, and bit depth rather than musical > content. > > _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
