Nikhil;185185 Wrote: > My concern, in simple scientific terminology, is that this experiment > does not have a proper control. As Phil rightly pointed out, in absence > of any compression technique, file size will simply be a function of > track lenghth, sampling rate, and bit depth rather than musical > content.
Hm, did I claim this was an experiment? If I did I understand your point. But I think this is reverse engineering. To your point, the "control" is yet to arrive - I have on order the V2 of the sampler disk. This disk has the same track done twice, once with and once without the HDCD encoding. I will run them through the 24b capture process and examine the waveforms. The expected results will be to see the waveform difference. That will be 100% conclusive. In the meantime I think Olav has nailed it... -- Eric Carroll Transporter-Bryston 3B SST-Paradigm Reference Studio 60 v.4 SB3-Rotel RB890-B&W Matrix 805 SB3-Pioneer VSX-49TXi-Mirage OM7+C2+R2 ReadyNAS NV+ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Carroll's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9293 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=32967 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
