Patrick Dixon;189369 Wrote: 
> Surely what you 'think' you hear is actually 'what you hear'?

True, but let's attempt to draw a distinction between audio improvement
and the listening experience.  

While there's room for subjectivism, most genuine audio
improvements/differences can be measured pretty easily and well (and,
of course, heard). But once we look at the listening experience and
start talking about differences that cannot be reliably discerned
either by ear (yes, ABX DBT) or measuring equipment we're into the
psychological realm.  In this realm it seems that, for those thus
disposed, the claim that any particular object might improve the sound
always results in an improved listening experience.  How do you
evaluate such an object on its merits in this case?  In these cases, it
seems to me that it's more instructive to evaluate how the marketing of
the object managed to affect the listener in such a way that they
somehow enjoyed the sound more.  But that's a psychological discussion
entirely divorced from any discussion of electronics or equipment.


-- 
azinck3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
azinck3's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3967
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=33707

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to