jonte0;194711 Wrote: > That may be OK on an audio output but how about a s/pdif output....?
Couldn't you still filter out the stuff above 1 GHz? Or maybe you would introduce just as much jitter by smoothing off the square wave as you would avoid by getting rid of the noise... what a pain. There's a reason why I'm not an engineer :-). Patrick Dixon Wrote: > > Because the buffer is filling at nominally the same rate as it's > emptying. If the buffer was capable of being filled much faster, and > filling could be stopped and started (a bit like streaming over tcp), > it's easy, but if you try to design a buffer for SPDIF you have to > overcome the overfilling and emptying issues, or 'adjust' the read > clock to compensate. Right, well as jonte0 says you can easily check what's the worst possible case. But there are slightly more sophisticated ways that are quite easy to think of - for example if you can change the clock speed you can simply monitor the buffer and adjust when necessary. That's how the Lavry DA10 is supposed to function, although it appears not to. -- opaqueice ------------------------------------------------------------------------ opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34406 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
