seanadams;229606 Wrote: > Reviewers can be highly biased towards their older, favored > technologies. However, while their own listening preferences may > disagree, the claim is well supported by any objective data you care to > consider: > > - Transporter supports higher quality digital formats, ie up to 24/96. > > - Transporter is not susceptible to media errors which can easily cause > clicks and skips in CD players. > > - CD player development is essentially dead and to my knowledge, no new > high-end models have come out which incorporate current DAC > technologies. > > - Transporter incorporates IMHO the best power/DAC/clock/analog design > that money can buy, even including standalone DACs. This is supported > by unsurpassed SNR, THD, etc. > > I'd suggest not worrying too much about what reviewers' listening tests > have to say, and try listening for yourself. If you really think your > old CD player sounds better then you are entitled to your opinion, but > I believe that in an unbiased/blind test Transporter would easily > outperform it.
I love the sound of my transporter , it has elevated my music plasure and it really makes eny amplifire i put it through sound briliant. I llove it so much that i would like to make it even better, not because it dossnet sound good enourgh because you can. -- harmonic ------------------------------------------------------------------------ harmonic's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6879 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=38653 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
