ezkcdude;229630 Wrote: > David, you said jitter has been "proven to be detrimental".
1) That paper, although made available on dCS's web page, is actually not public relations. Have you read it at all? 2) I could have a look for more research papers, as you could yourself if you're really interested in the matter itself (given the rate at which you flicked through the above-mentioned one, I can't say I'm tempted - it's past 4 a.m. over here). 3) But could you please consider the most simple and obvious of all: if a 1 (there) gets misinterpreted for a 0 (not there) because of an error in timing, would the absence of something that should be there count for you as measurable and in its extrapolation at some point audible effect/defect (again, the threshold value may or may not still have to be determined), and even more so, vice versa? Have a good night now! Greetings from Switzerland, David. -- acousticsguru ------------------------------------------------------------------------ acousticsguru's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13298 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=38637 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
