kifysara;230367 Wrote: > Hmm, did you read the whole article? Yes. Why?
Chinanico;230369 Wrote: > One might argue that half of them did hear the difference and that half > of them were unlucky. I guess that's the problem with tests limited to > double blind over 500 persons (refered to as 2/500), I highly recommend > quadruple blind tests over 1000 persons (4/1000), that gives much more > precise result... Yes, that's possible, and one can easily compute the odds it happened (hint - they are very very very small). -- opaqueice ------------------------------------------------------------------------ opaqueice's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4234 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=38596 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
