I think what acoustic wants, and he can correct me, is a Transporter
with out the "er". IOW, a Transporter minus the output stage. I would
also be interested in such a component, perhaps, with only a single
display. If that came in around $1000, I'm sure there would be plenty
of folks who would want one. I don't know if there would be enough
demand for it to make sense financially for SD/Logitech, but all the
same, I'm with acoustic on this one. I think we should just forget
about the "why?", and simply ask "who?". Who would want one? What will
the market bear? It seems to me going on and on about the jitter debate
is counterproductive (yeah, I know I've contributed to it) at this
point. If there is a market, then it will be made. There is quite a bit
of "in between" between the SB3 and the Transporter.


-- 
ezkcdude

There are 10 kind of people in the world - those who understand binary
and those who don't.
SHINYMETAL
'*Site*' (http://www.ezdiyaudio.com)| '*RSS*'
(http://www2.kumc.edu/students/ezamir/rss/ezdiyaudio.xml) |'*Forum*'
(http://ezdiyaudio.informe.com)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ezkcdude's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2545
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=38637

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to