haraldo;264411 Wrote: > B.T.W. > > The DS is obviously so nice and flexible and future proof.... > And of course, as previously stated, the DS may be used with anything > in the world...... > > How do you go on utilizing it if you've got a Basic Lyngdorf TDAI 2000 > or a Tact Millennium, that only got digital inputs? > > Any reasonable player in the world above $200 has got provisions for > such a connection. (Or at least should have) > > -H
Well issent that quit obvious. Why on earth would you pay 20 k for a analog source and then use only the transport mecanisem wich can be bourgt for 50 usd? I know many people use better dacs with the cheap squeesbox in persuit of better sound but as i see it thats the wrong way. Better have it all in one box where all the data and analog conversions are syncronised. The klimax ds is ment as a uncompromised product where cost and development time was unlimited. You can not better that with outside componets that then have to syncroniced with the DS making the system more sensitiv to jitter , noise and timing distorsions . to better the units sound is what i stated about the future upgrades , improve the design itself inside the unit. -- harmonic ------------------------------------------------------------------------ harmonic's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6879 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=38815 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
