PLynas;269261 Wrote: > For me, no screen or onboard controls just like the new Duet. > > I know that many people are opposed to this idea and like the screen, > but there are many people who simply don't need or want it. I am sure > there are many people like myself who cannot justify spending so much > on the Transporter, but surely removing the screens and the associated > on board controls would bring the price down. > > You might not all agree, but surely it benefits all to have a more > affordable, mass market product with the same audio quality??
Turn the display off, or better, hide it in the closet. Im sure you would also like a computer without screen and a book without words. I assume that you sleep in a murphy bed, use in wall speakers and have everything including books inside closed cabinets... Just to keep the cost down... sorry, but this argument is even cheaper than no display for better audio quality. -- GuyDebord Reference3A RoyalMaster monitors biwired with van den Hul Inspiration, REL Strata5. AMPS: Pathos Classic One MKIII's in mono config. ANALOGUE: Clearaudio Ambient CMB, Satisfy Carbon & Lyra Helikon SL, ASR MiniBasis SQ preamp, link: WireWorld SilverEclipse 5.2. DIGITAL: SlimDevices Transporter, link: AcousticZen Silver Reference2 XLRs. POWER: Isotek MiniSub GII, Isotek Elite cables (MiniSub, Rel), Siltech SPX30 MKII (Transporter), van den Hul Mainstream (Pathos) & van den Hul Mainserver (ASR). ------------------------------------------------------------------------ GuyDebord's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14587 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=43466
_______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
