haraldo wrote: > Does that mean that the Jitter rejection tests performed in Stereophile > are readily useless? or do they provide some value?
I am not Sean, but I do believe that the tests in Stereophile for Jitter are filler. Or techno-mumble-jumbo. JA makes a big deal of the numbers, but its not clear that the numbers have the meaning and value that he implies. If the numbers are twice as large, is that twice as bad? I don't think so. I don't believe that jitter is nearly as important as the audiophile press claims. Of course they would have to do DBT to show its meaningful, and that is Off Topic. -- Pat Farrell http://www.pfarrell.com/ _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
