opaqueice;344553 Wrote: 
> The problem is average clock speed mismatch.  Suppose your local clock
> is 1% faster.  Then you better wait a minute or so before you start
> playing on a gapless 100 minute series of tracks...

Sure we can suppose things but it isn't even close to reality. A bad
crystal oscillator (let's suppose this is what's in there as it's
dirt-cheap) is 100 ppm accurate. This translates to 0.001% so that's
1000 times as good as your assumption and the minute-buffer-time would
actually just be 0.06 seconds instead of 1 minute. These crystals list
at 50 cents a piece.

Now suppose the manufacturer like us and decides to put in a good
crystal, quality like used in a good watch. It will be around 20 ppm
accurate which translates to 0.0002% so 5000 times as good as assumed
resulting in an error for that 100 minute playback of 0.012 seconds.
These crystals list at $1 a piece

I talked about oven-controlled crystal oscillators before. They come as
good as 0.01 ppm accurate (!!!) and I can't even type the percentage
without wearing out the "0" key on my keyboard (If I count the zeroes
right on my calculator, it's 1% divided by 10-million!). This top of
the line OCTXCO lists around $100-200. See here:
http://search.digikey.com/scripts/DkSearch/dksus.dll?Detail?name=CW634-ND

So, even with a 100-minute playback and a 50-cent crystal, there should
be no problem at all. 

cheers,
Nick.


-- 
DeVerm
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DeVerm's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18104
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=52817

_______________________________________________
audiophiles mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles

Reply via email to