Timothy Stockman;335301 Wrote: > The main useful difference between 48 KHz and 96 KHz is that 96 KHz can > use a reconstruction filter with a much gentler slope, which would > typically have superior sonic characteristics. Modern DACs achieve most > of the benefits of higher sampling rates by using oversampling digital > reconstruction filters. You seem to say that half of the _real_ samples are useless in 96kHz, and that they could as well be calculated. That's really strange, don't you find ? Perhaps we should downgrade to 24kHz ? or -still better- 12kHz ? :)
-- Themis SB3 - North Star dac 192 - Denon 3808 - Sonus Faber Grand Piano Domus ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Themis's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14700 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41144 _______________________________________________ audiophiles mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles
